Alternatives in Framing and Decision Making

Mind and Language 28 (1):1-19 (2013)

Abstract

There is a wealth of experimental data showing that the way a problem is framed may have an effect on people's choices and decisions. Based on a semantic analysis of evaluative expressions like ‘good’, I propose a new explanation of such framing effects. The key idea is that our choices and decisions reveal a counterfactual systematicity: they carry information about the choices and decisions we would have made if the facts had been otherwise. It is these counterfactual alternatives that may diverge between otherwise equivalent versions of the same task, and thus explain the effects of framing

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
32 (#361,321)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Geurts
Radboud University Nijmegen

References found in this work

A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
Quantity Implicatures.Bart Geurts - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Jon Barwise & Laurence R. Horn - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects.Jason Hanna - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):517-531.
What Lies Beneath: Reframing Framing Effects.John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Framing as Path Dependence.Natalie Gold & Christian List - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):253-277.
Ethical Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Ido Millet - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1197-1204.