Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):1 (1984)
Human rights are rights which all persons equally have simply insofar as they are human. But are there any such rights? How, if at all, do we know that there are? It is with this question of knowledge, and the related question of existence, that I want to deal in this paper. 1. CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS The attempt to answer each of these questions, however, at once raises further, more directly conceptual questions. In what sense may human rights be said to exist? What does it mean to say that there are such rights or that persons have them? This question, in turn, raises a question about the nature of human rights. What is the meaning of the expression “human rights”? Within the limits of the present paper I cannot hope to deal adequately with the controversial issues raised by these conceptual questions. But we may make at least a relevant beginning by noting that, in terms of Hohfeld's famous classification of four different kinds of rights, the human rights are primarily claim-rights, in that they entail correlative duties of other persons or groups to act or to refrain from acting in ways required for the right-holders' having that to which they have rights. It will help our understanding of this and other aspects of human rights if we note that the full structure of a claim-right is given by the following formula: A has a right to X against B by virtue of Y. There are five main elements here: first, the Subject of the right, the person or persons who have the right; second, the Nature of the right; third, the Object of the right, what it is a right to; fourth, the Respondent of the right, the person or persons who have the correlative duty; fifth, the Justifying Basis or Ground of the right
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
FOCUS: A Comparison of Business Ethics in North America and Continental Europe.Georges Enderle - 1996 - Business Ethics 5 (1):33–46.
Effects of Defects-Action or Argument? Thoughts About Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword's Law as a Moral Judgment.Robert Alexy - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (2):169-179.
Corporate Strategy and Ethics.Daniel R. Gilbert - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2):137 - 150.
Natural Rights to Welfare.Siegfried van Duffel - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
FOCUS: A Comparison of Business Ethics in North America and Continental Europe.Georges Enderle - 1996 - Business Ethics: A European Review 5 (1):33-46.
Similar books and articles
Human Rights Without Foundations.Joseph Raz - 2010 - In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance.John Mahoney - 2007 - Blackwell.
Human Rights in Cuba, El Salvador, and Nicaragua: A Sociological Perspective on Human Rights Abuse.Mayra Gómez - 2003 - Routledge.
Language Rights as Collective Rights: Some Conceptual Considerations on Language Rights.Manuel Toscano - 2012 - Res Publica 27:109-118.
Human Rights.João Cardoso Rosas - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 11:93-100.
Religion, Religions, and Human Rights.Louis Henkin - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229-239.
The Concept of Rights in Contemporary Human Rights Discourse.Christine Chwaszcza - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (3):333-364.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.
Human Rights and Human Dignity.Doris Schroeder - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads109 ( #42,918 of 2,143,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #82,180 of 2,143,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.