Authors |
|
Abstract |
New Zealand’s curriculum, in terms of its approach to technological literacy, attempts to deliver a sound, philosophy-based understanding of the nature of technology. The curriculum’s main authors claim that it conforms well to Mitcham’s categorization of different aspects of technology’s nature. Nevertheless, taking advantage of the existing literature of the philosophy of technology, this paper will reveal that the intended urriculum, though an admirable approach, still has a number of points needing improvement, and there are also certain gaps to be bridged in the claimed conformity. This analysis primarily makes use of the method initiated by Nia and De Vries, based upon Mitcham’s suggested framework and other philosophers’ opinions as to the nature and various features of technology.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.15663/ajte.v3i1.38 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering And.Carl Mitcham - forthcoming - Philosophy.
Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences.Anthonie Meijers (ed.) - 2009 - Elsevier/North Holland.
Readings in the Philosophy of Technology.David M. Kaplan (ed.) - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
'Standards' on the Bench: Do Standards for Technological Literacy Render an Adequate Image of Technology?M. M. Ghaemi Nia & M. J. de Vries - 2016 - Journal of Technology and Science Education 6 (1).
Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership.Mark David Webster - 2017 - Journal of Educational Technology and Society 20 (1):25–36.
Ethical Technological Literacy as Democratic Curriculum Keystone.Steve Keirl - 2006 - In John R. Dakers (ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Examining Philosophy of Technology Using Grounded Theory Methods.Mark David Webster - 2016 - Forum: Qualitative Social Research 17 (2).
Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy.Carl Mitcham - 1994 - University of Chicago Press.
Reductionist Philosophy of Technology:Stones Thrown From Inside a Glass House.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1994 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (1):21-28.
Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework.John R. Dakers (ed.) - 2006 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Philosophy of Technology and Macro-Ethics in Engineering.Wha-Chul Son - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Global Technological Change: From Hard Technology to Soft Technology.Zhouying Jin - 2011 - Intellect.
Philosophy of Technology Assumptions in Educational Technology Leadership: Questioning Technological Determinism.Mark David Webster - 2013 - Dissertation, Northcentral University
Determining Technology: Myopia and Dystopia.Gregory Swer - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):201-210.
Basic Principles in Holistic Technology Education.Kurt Seemann - 2003 - Journal of Technology Education 14 (2):15.
Concerning Technology: Heidegger and the Question of Technological Essentialism.Tracy Colony - 2009 - Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):23-34.
Questioning Two Assumptions in the Metaphysics of Technological Objects.Sadjad Soltanzadeh - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):127-135.
How to Understand Mundane Technology : New Ways of Thinking About Human-Technology Relations.Mike Michael - 2006 - In John R. Dakers (ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 50--63.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-10-26
Total views
14 ( #734,940 of 2,518,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,158 )
2017-10-26
Total views
14 ( #734,940 of 2,518,158 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,158 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads