Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
Quantum mechanics, with its revolutionary implications, has posed innumerable problems to philosophers of science. In particular, it has suggested reconsidering basic concepts such as the existence of a world that is, at least to some extent, independent of the observer, the possibility of getting reliable and objective knowledge about it, and the possibility of taking (under appropriate circumstances) certain properties to be objectively possessed by physical systems. It has also raised many others questions which are well known to those involved in the debate on the interpretation of this pillar of modern science. One can argue that most of the problems are not only due to the intrinsic revolutionary nature of the phenomena which have led to the development of the theory. They are also related to the fact that, in its standard formulation and interpretation, quantum mechanics is a theory which is excellent (in fact it has met with a success unprecedented in the history of science) in telling us everything about what we observe, but it meets with serious difficulties in telling us what is. We are making here specific reference to the central problem of the theory, usually referred to as the measurement problem, or, with a more appropriate term, as the macro-objectification problem. It is just one of the many attempts to overcome the difficulties posed by this problem that has led to the development of Collapse Theories, i.e., to the Dynamical Reduction Program (DRP). As we shall see, this approach consists in accepting that the dynamical equation of the standard theory should be modified by the addition of stochastic and nonlinear terms. The nice fact is that the resulting theory is capable, on the basis of a unique dynamics which is assumed to govern all natural processes, to account at the same time for all well-established..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Quantum Propensities.Mauricio Suárez - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):418-438.
Four Tails Problems for Dynamical Collapse Theories.Kelvin J. McQueen - 2015 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49:10-18.
Quantum Probabilities as Degrees of Belief.Jeffrey Bub - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):232-254.
Primitive Ontology and Quantum State in the GRW Matter Density Theory.Matthias Egg & Michael Esfeld - 2015 - Synthese 192 (10):3229-3245.
Similar books and articles
A New Look at the Quantum Mechanical Problem of Measurement.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - American Journal of Physics 40:1431-5..
Making Quantum Theory Compatible with Realism.GianCarlo Ghirardi - 2002 - Foundations of Science 7 (1-2):11-47.
Desiderata for a Modified Quantum Dynamics.Abner Shimony - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:49 - 59.
Interpreting State Reduction From the Practices-Up.Alberto Cordero - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:263-275.
Decoherence in Unorthodox Formulations of Quantum Mechanics.Vassilios Karakostas & Michael Dickson - 1995 - Synthese 102 (1):61 - 97.
Quantum Dynamical Reduction and Reality: Replacing Probability Densities with Densities in Real Space. [REVIEW]Giancarlo Ghirardi - 1996 - Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):349 - 365.
The Suggestive Properties of Quantum Mechanics Without the Collapse Postulate.Jeffrey A. Barrett - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):233 - 252.
Everett's Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Barrett - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #404,671 of 2,171,970 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,970 )
How can I increase my downloads?