Strategic Reasoning: Building Cognitive Models from Logical Formulas

Abstract
This paper presents an attempt to bridge the gap between logical and cognitive treatments of strategic reasoning in games. There have been extensive formal debates about the merits of the principle of backward induction among game theorists and logicians. Experimental economists and psychologists have shown that human subjects, perhaps due to their bounded resources, do not always follow the backward induction strategy, leading to unexpected outcomes. Recently, based on an eye-tracking study, it has turned out that even human subjects who produce the outwardly correct ‘backward induction answer’ use a different internal reasoning strategy to achieve it. The paper presents a formal language to represent different strategies on a finer-grained level than was possible before. The language and its semantics help to precisely distinguish different cognitive reasoning strategies, that can then be tested on the basis of computational cognitive models and experiments with human subjects. The syntactic framework of the formal system provides a generic way of constructing computational cognitive models of the participants of the Marble Drop game
Keywords Strategic reasoning  Cognitive modeling  Logical frameworks  Experimental studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10849-014-9196-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Representing and Reasoning About Game Strategies.Dongmo Zhang & Michael Thielscher - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (2):203-236.
Should Reason Be Fragmented?Nenad Miščević - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):23-36.
The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (8):349-357.
Added to PP index
2014-04-12

Total downloads
91 ( #65,638 of 2,235,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #24,543 of 2,235,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature