Philosophical Inquiries 1 (8):117-40 (2020)

Authors
Matthew Tugby
Durham University
Abstract
Vetter (2015) develops a localised theory of modality, based on potentialities of actual objects. Two factors play a key role in its appeal: its commitment to Hardcore Actualism, and to Naturalism. Vetter’s commitment to Naturalism is in part manifested in her adoption of Aristotelian universals. In this paper, we argue that a puzzle concerning the identity of unmanifested potentialities cannot be solved with an Aristotelian conception of properties. After introducing the puzzle, we examine Vetter’s attempt at amending the Aristotelian conception in a way that avoids the puzzle, and conclude that this amended version is no longer to be considered naturalistic. Potentiality theory cannot be both actualist and naturalist. We then argue that, if naturalism is to be abandoned by the actualist, there are good reasons to adopt a Platonist conception of universals, for they offer a number of theoretical advantages and allow us to avoid some of the problems facing Vetter’s theory.
Keywords Potentiality  Platonic Universals  Dispositionalism  Vetter  Naturalism  Actualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford University Press.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

New Powers for Dispositionalism.Giacomo Giannini - 2020 - Synthese (ST: New Foundations for Disposit):1-30.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Hardcore Actualism Validate S5?Samuel Kimpton-Nye - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2):342-358.
Trigger Happy. Ein Kommentar zu Barbara Vetters Potentiality.Markus Schrenk - 2015 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 69 (3):396-402.
Replies.Barbara Vetter - 2020 - Philosophical Inquiries 1 (8):199-222.
Potentiality.Jessica Leech - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):457-467.
Universals, Laws, and Governance.Matthew Tugby - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1147-1163.
Non-Factualist Dispositionalism.Manuel Heras-Escribano - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):607-629.
Potentiality and Possibility.Barbara Vetter - 2010 - Dissertation, Oxford
Universals: Ways or Things?Scott Berman - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (2):219-234.
Platonic Dispositionalism.Matthew Tugby - 2013 - Mind 122 (486):fzt071.
Why Pan-Dispositionalism is Incompatible with Metaphysical Naturalism.Travis Dumsday - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):107-122.
The Limits of Aristotelian Naturalism.Irene Liu - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (3):269-286.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-27

Total views
150 ( #70,543 of 2,448,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #12,161 of 2,448,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes