Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates [Book Review]

Argumentation 26 (3):393-407 (2012)
Abstract
An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically ambiguous expression, a passage that needs to be read charitably, and a previously unnoticed but crucial shift between two notions of unholy. Different analyses may be provided, depending on how these interpretation problems are solved. The conditions under which the refutation is valid and successful are far from obvious, and are here explicitly specified
Keywords Socrates  Validity  Ambiguity  Rhetoric
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-012-9267-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,662
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Socratic Studies.Gregory Vlastos - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Definitions.Anil Gupta - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Definition.Richard Robinson - 1950 - Clarendon Press.
Plato's Earlier Dialectic.Richard Robinson - 1941 - Oxford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Chiastic Contradiction at Euthyphro 9e1-11b5. Kim - 2004 - Phronesis 49 (3):219-224.
Socrates on the Definition of Piety.S. Marc Cohen - 1971 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
Logical Form.Christopher Menzel - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
A Partisan's Guide to Socratic Intellectualism.Matthew Evans - 2010 - In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press. pp. 6.
The Euthyphro Argument (9d–11b).Brendan O'Sullivan - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):657-675.
The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Mickelson - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439.
Scepticism and the Interpreter.Damian Cox - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (2):61-72.
Socrates and Euthyphro: The Argument and its Revival.Terence Irwin - 2006 - In Lindsay Judson & V. Karasmanēs (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-04-09

Total downloads

14 ( #319,879 of 2,143,791 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #387,161 of 2,143,791 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums