Interpreting words, interpreting worlds

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):439–450 (2006)

Authors
John Gibson
University of Louisville
Abstract
It is often assumed that literary meaning is essentially linguistic in nature and that literary interpretation is therefore a purely linguistic affair. This essay identifies a variety of literary meaning that cannot be reduced to linguistic meaning. Meaning of this sort is generated not by a communicative act so much as through a creative one: the construction of a fictional world. The way in which a fictional world can bear meaning turns out to be strikingly unlike the way a sentence can, and this, I argue, has important implications for the theory of interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00222.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cognitivism and the Arts.John Gibson - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):573-589.
According to the Fiction. A Metaexpressivist Account.Daniel Dohrn - 2015 - Proceedings of the European Society of Aesthetics 7.
Narrative and the Literary Imagination.John Gibson - 2014 - In Allen Speight (ed.), Narrative, Philosophy & Life. Springer. pp. 135-50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
584 ( #7,388 of 2,286,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #21,689 of 2,286,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature