The intentionalist controversy and cognitive science

Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):181-205 (1993)
Abstract What role do speakers'/authors? communicative intentions play in language interpretation? Cognitive scientists generally assume that listeners'/readers? recognitions of speakers'/authors? intentions is a crucial aspect of utterance interpretation. Various philosophers, literary theorists and anthropologists criticize this intentional view and assert that speakers'/authors? intentions do not provide either the starting point for linguistic interpretation or constrain how texts should be understood. Until now, cognitive scientists have not seriously responded to the current challenges regarding intentions in communication. My purpose in this article is to provide just such a response. I briefly describe some of the empirical evidence in cognitive science on the importance of intentions in communication. I then discuss some of the criticisms of the intentional view that have arisen in the humanities and social sciences. Following this, I offer a partial resolution to the intentionalist controversy that recognizes the differing views on the idea of linguistic interpretation. I specifically suggest a way of thinking about linguistic interpretation in terms of the time?course of understanding that provides a metric for evaluating the role of intentions in communication. This time?course perspective on linguistic understanding provides for the plurality of ideas that now exist both in cognitive science and in postmodern philosophical thought
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089308573087
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,150
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Of Grammatology.Jacques Derrida - 1998 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Intentionality.John Searle - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Writing and Difference.Jacques Derrida - 1978 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Scepticism About Reflexive Intentions Refuted.Maciej Witek - 2009 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83.
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.
Meaning, Belief, and Language Acquisition.Mark Risjord - 1996 - Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):465-475.
Intentions and Demonstrations.Kent Bach - 1992 - Analysis 52 (3):140--146.
Cognitive Anthropologists: Who Needs Them?Annelie Rothe - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):387-395.
Intentions, Goals, and the Archaeological Record.Rex Welshon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):425-426.
Francisco Varela's View on Phenomenology in His Cognitive Interpretation.Rocco Marchitelli - 2010 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 3 (2):42-44.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

34 ( #147,439 of 2,152,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,478 of 2,152,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums