The logic of chastity: Women, sex, and the history of philosophy in the early modern period

Hypatia 21 (4):1-19 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


: Before women could become visible as philosophers, they had first to become visible as rational autonomous thinkers. A social and ethical position holding that chastity was the most important virtue for women, and that rationality and chastity were incompatible, was a significant impediment to accepting women's capacity for philosophical thought. Thus one of the first tasks for women was to confront this belief and argue for their rationality in the face of a self-referential dilemma



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

123 (#125,834)

6 months
3 (#344,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction.Robert P. Russell - 1961 - The Saint Augustine Lecture Series:5-6.
Juan Luis Vives and the Emotions.Carlos G. Noreña - 1989 - Southern Illinois University Press.
The Renaissance concept of philosophy.Cesare Vasoli - 1988 - In Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner & Eckhard Kessler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60--61.
Introduction.G. H. R. Parkinson - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 14:1-20.

View all 12 references / Add more references