The logic of chastity: Women, sex, and the history of philosophy in the early modern period

Hypatia 21 (4):1-19 (2006)

Abstract
: Before women could become visible as philosophers, they had first to become visible as rational autonomous thinkers. A social and ethical position holding that chastity was the most important virtue for women, and that rationality and chastity were incompatible, was a significant impediment to accepting women's capacity for philosophical thought. Thus one of the first tasks for women was to confront this belief and argue for their rationality in the face of a self-referential dilemma
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/HYP.2006.21.4.1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,401
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introduction.G. H. R. Parkinson - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 14:1-20.
Introduction.Robert P. Russell - 1961 - The Saint Augustine Lecture Series:5-6.
The Renaissance Concept of Philosophy.Cesare Vasoli - 1988 - In Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner & Eckhard Kessler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60--61.
Dialogue on the Infinity of Love.Tullia D'Aragona - 1997 - University of Chicago Press.
Juan Luis Vives and the Emotions.Carlos G. NORENA - 1989 - Southern Illinois University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
98 ( #79,448 of 2,255,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #756,175 of 2,255,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature