Zygon 32 (2):207-217 (1997)

Alfred Gierer
Max-Planck-Institute of Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany
Modern science, based on the laws of physics, claims validity for all events in space and time. However, it also reveals its own limitations, such as the indeterminacy of quantum physics, the limits of decidability, and, presumably, limits of decodability of the mind-brain relationship. At the philosophical level, these intrinsic limitations allow for different interpretations of the relation between human cognition and the natural order. In particular, modern science may be logically consistent with religious as well as agnostic views of humans and the universe. These points are exemplified through the transcript of a discussion between Kurt Gödel and Rudolf Carnap that took place in 1940. Gödel, discoverer of mathematical undecidability, took a proreligious view; Carnap, one of the founders of analytical philosophy, an antireligious view. By the time of the discussion, Carnap had liberalized his ideas on theoretical concepts of science: he believed that observational terms do not suffice for an exhaustive definition of theoretical concepts. Then, responded Gödel, one should formulate a theory or metatheory that is consistent with scientific rationality, yet also encompasses theology. Carnap considered such theories unproductive. The controversy remained unresolved, but its emphasis shifted from rationality to wisdom, not only in the Gödel-Carnap discussion but also in our time. -/- .
Keywords Rudolf Carnap   decision theory   Kurt Gödel   mind-brain relationship   philosophy of science   quantum indeterminacy   Rudolf Carnap   decision theory   Kurt Gödel   mind-brain relationship   philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0591-2385.841997083
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The 'Mental' and the 'Physical'.Herbert Feigl - 1958 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:370-497.
Reflections on Kurt Godel.Stewart Shapiro - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (1):130.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Carnap, the Principle of Tolerance, and Empiricism.Robert Hudson - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):341-358.
Gödel and Carnap.Steve Awodey & A. W. Carus - 2010 - In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Kurt Gödel: Essays for His Centennial. Association for Symbolic Logic.
The Reception of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems.John W. Dawson - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:253 - 271.
Rule and Similarity as Prototype Concepts.Edward E. Smith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):34-35.
Carnap, Gödel, and the Analyticity of Arithmetic.Neil Tennant - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):100-112.
Logicism, Pragmatism, and Metascience: Towards a Pancritical Pragmatic Theory of Meta-Level Discourse.G. S. Axtell - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:39 - 49.
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems and Computer Science.Roman Murawski - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.


Added to PP index

Total views
451 ( #21,493 of 2,520,901 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #35,089 of 2,520,901 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes