Hebrew and buddhist selves: A constructive postmodern study

Asian Philosophy 17 (1):47 – 64 (2007)
Our task will be to demonstrate that there are instructive parallels between Hebrew and Buddhist concepts of self. There are at least five main constituents (skandhas in Sanskrit) of the Hebrew self: (1) nepe as living being; (2) rah as indwelling spirit; (3) lb as heart-mind; (4) bāār as flesh; and (5) dām as blood. We will compare these with the five Buddhist skandhas: disposition (samskāra), consciousness (vijñāna), feeling (vedanā), perception (samjñā), and body (rpa). Generally, what we will discover is that both Buddhists and Hebrews have a 'bundle' theory of the self; both see the body as an essential part of personal identity; both overcome the modernist distinction of the inner and the outer; and both avoid language about the will as a distinct faculty. In sum, both present us with a fully somatic and nondualistic view of being human.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552360701201098
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
From Morality to Virtue.Michael Slote - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Buddhist Ethics.Damien Keown - 1992 - St. Martin's Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
25 ( #227,729 of 2,224,474 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #75,132 of 2,224,474 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature