A functional view of artistic evaluation

Philosophical Studies 155 (2):289-305 (2011)
Abstract
I develop and defend the following functional view of art: a work of art typically possesses as an essential feature one or more points, purposes, or ends with reference to the satisfaction of which that work can be appropriately evaluated. This way of seeing a work’s artistic value as dependent on its particular artistic ends (whatever they may be) suggests an answer to a longstanding question of what sort of internal relation, if any, exists between the wide variety of values (moral, cognitive, aesthetic, etc.) that may be possessed by works of art and their value qua works of art
Keywords Ethical Criticism   Genre
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9570-8
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,530
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
In Defense of Proper Functions.Ruth G. Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1997 - In Garrett Cullity & Berys Gaut (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ontological Dependence.Kit Fine - 1994 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:269 - 290.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Explanations: Aesthetic and Scientific.Shen-yi Liao - 2014 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 75:127-149.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-06-09

Total downloads
75 ( #74,303 of 2,210,799 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #357,939 of 2,210,799 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature