Neuroethics (forthcoming)

Fred Gilbert
University of Tasmania
Justin Brown
University of Tasmania
One important concern regarding implantable Brain Computer Interfaces is the fear that the intervention will negatively change a patient’s sense of identity or agency. In particular, there is concern that the user will be psychologically worse-off following treatment despite postoperative functional improvements. Clinical observations from similar implantable brain technologies, such as deep brain stimulation, show a small but significant proportion of patients report feelings of strangeness or difficulty adjusting to a new concept of themselves characterized by a maladaptive je ne sais quoi despite clear motor improvement. Despite the growing number of cases in the DBS literature, there is currently no accepted or standardized tool in neuroethics specifically designed to capture the phenomenological postoperative experience of patients implanted with DBS or BCI devices. Given potential risks of postoperative maladaptation, it is important for the field of neuroethics to develop a qualitative instrument that can serve as a shared method for capturing postoperative variations in patient experience of identity and agency. The goal of this article is to introduce an instrument we have developed for this purpose and call for further neuroethical efforts to assess the phenomenology of implantable brain device use.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-019-09422-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,156
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neuroethics in the Shadow of a Pandemic.Adina L. Roskies & Ashley Walton - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (3):W1-W4.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Implantable Devices.E. B. Wu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):532-533.
A Convenient Mirror-Drawing Device.H. C. Lehman & P. A. Witty - 1927 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (2):114.
Implantable Brain Chips? Time for Debate.G. Q. Maguire & Ellen M. McGee - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (1):7-13.
Implantable Brain Chips — Will They Change Who We Are?Phd Daniel Dennett - 2001 - Lahey Clinic Medical Ethics Journal 1:6-7.
Attentional Capture and Attentional Character.P. Sven Arvidson - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):539-562.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,070,456 of 2,411,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,282 of 2,411,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes