Metaphysica 13 (2):217-227 (2012)

Aristotelian philosophers have been always puzzled by the ambiguous status of essences: it is not clear whether an Aristotelian should admit that an essence, taken in itself, is real, even though essences do not exist over and above particular things, as Platonists posit; furthermore, it is not clear whether an Aristotelian should endorse the view that essences have a certain unity, even if they are taken in themselves, namely, by abstracting from the individuals of which they are essences. I tackle Thomas Cajetan’s analysis of this problem: this analysis is more sophisticated than that developed by Aquinas—whose texts had been commented upon by Cajetan. Cajetan distinguishes two senses of “real” and of “unity,” in order to speak of the reality and of the unity of essences, taken in themselves, though not endorsing a Platonist’s ontology. I suggest that his solution is appealing for the contemporary debate about this problem.
Keywords Aquinas  Thomas Cajetan  Renaissance Philosophy  Metaphysics  Essentialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12133-012-0105-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Real Essentialism.David Oderberg - 2007 - New York: Routledge.
Aristotle's Metaphysics. Aristotle - 1924 - Clarendon Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Thomists on Analogy.Petr Dvořák - 2006 - Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):28-36.
The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2010 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: University of Notre Dame Press.
Natural Kinds and the Problem of Complex Essences.Travis Dumsday - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):619-634.
Analogy in St. Thomas and Cajetan.Herbert Thomas Schwartz - 1954 - New Scholasticism 28 (2):127-144.
How Essentialists Misunderstand Locke.Nigel Leary - 2009 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (3):273-292.


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #210,838 of 2,454,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,910 of 2,454,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes