A theory of love and sexual desire

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (4):339–357 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The experience of being in love involves a longing for union with the other, where an important part of this longing is sexual desire. But what is the relation between being in love and sexual desire? To answer this it must first be seen that the expression ‘in love’ normally refers to a personal relationship. This is because to be ‘in love’ is to want to be loved back. This much would be predicted by equity and social exchange theories of interpersonal attraction. Findings suggest however that love differs fundamentally from liking and, consequently, distinct approaches to the theory of love have been developed. A phenomenological theory is then put forward which suggests that the experience of being in love involves a complex of desires for reciprocal vulnerability in order to care and be cared for. Sexual desire is then seen to involve the physical expression of these desires in the form of desires for mutual baring in order to caress and be caressed. Unlike love, however, sexual desire need not refer to the other person's desires. This is supported by the existence of sexual desires like fetishism. It is concluded that other desires which often appear in instances of being in love are not basic to the experience of being in love.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,445

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Sexual Desire.James Giles - 2008 - University Press of America.
Love and Sex.Raja Halwani - 2024 - In Christopher Grau & Aaron Smuts (eds.), "Introduction" for the Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Love. NYC: Oxford University Press.
5. Love as sexual desire: Lucretius and Ovid.Simon May - 2011 - In Love: A History. New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 69-80.
Sex.Raja Halwani - 2016 - In James M. Petrik & Arthur Zucker (eds.), Philosophy: Sex and Love. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 29-52.
Love's Negative Dialectic in Henry James's The Golden Bowl.Suzie Gibson - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (1):1-14.
Being Trans, Being Loved: Clashing Identities and the Limits of Love.Gen Eickers - 2022 - In Arina Pismenny & Berit Brogaard (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Love. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 171-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#106,262)

6 months
13 (#193,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Giles
Roskilde University

Citations of this work

The Syndrome of Love.Ryan Stringer - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7:480-510.
The Philosophy of sex: contemporary readings.Alan Soble (ed.) - 1980 - Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Can Our Beloved Pets Love Us Back?Ryan Stringer - 2021 - In Simon Cushing (ed.), New Philosophical Essays on Love and Loving. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 241-268.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Principles of Psychology.William James - 1890 - London, England: Dover Publications.
Cognition and Categorization.Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Bloom Lloyd (eds.) - 1978 - Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
The collected dialogues of Plato, including the letters. Plato & Bollingen Foundation - 1961 - [New York]: Pantheon Books. Edited by Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns.
The Qualitative Research Interview.Steinar Kvale - 1983 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14 (1-2):171-196.

View all 14 references / Add more references