Argumentation 9 (5):837-852 (1995)

Authors
Michael A. Gilbert
York University
Abstract
Coalescent argumentation is a normative ideal that involves the joining together of two disparate claims through recognition and exploration of opposing positions. By uncovering the crucial connection between a claim and the attitudes, beliefs, feelings, values and needs to which it is connected dispute partners are able to identify points of agreement and disagreement. These points can then be utilized to effect coalescence, a joining or merging of divergent positions, by forming the basis for a mutual investigation of non-conflictual options that might otherwise have remained unconsidered. The essay proceeds by defining and discussing ‘argument’, ‘position’ and ‘understanding’. These notions are then brought together to outline the concept of coalescent reasoning
Keywords dialectic  coalescence  multi-modal argumentation  argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00744761
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Web of Belief.W. V. O. Quine & J. S. Ullian - 1970 - New York: Random House.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas WALTON - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Frederick L. Will & Stephen Toulmin - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (3):399.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.

View all 142 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argumentation in Higher Education: Examples of Actual Practices with Argumentation Tools.Jerry E. B. Andriessen - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and Education. Springer. pp. 195--214.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-18

Total views
75 ( #141,613 of 2,445,014 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #76,730 of 2,445,014 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes