Differentiating insight from non-insight problems

Thinking and Reasoning 11 (3):279 – 302 (2005)

Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether a range of tasks that have been generally classed as requiring insight form an empirically separable group of tasks distinct from tasks generally classed as non-insight. In this study, 24 insight tasks, 10 non-insight tasks, and tests of individual differences in cognitive abilities and working memory were administered to 60 participants. Cluster analysis of the problem-solving tasks indicated that the presumed insight problems did tend to cluster with other presumed insight problems, and similarly the presumed non-insight problems tended to cluster with other presumed non-insight tasks. Performance on presumed insight problems was particularly linked to measures of ideational flexibility with a different pattern of results for the non-insight tasks. Spatial insight problems were linked to spatial flexibility and verbal insight tasks were linked to vocabulary scores. The results are discussed in relation to recent developments of dual process theories of thinking.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13546780442000187
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory?Alan Baddeley - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):417-423.
In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.Jonathan StB. T. Evans - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10):454-459.
The Associative Basis of the Creative Process.Sarnoff Mednick - 1962 - Psychological Review 69 (3):220-232.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Importance of Chance and Interactivity in Creativity.David Kirsh - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (1):5-26.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Insight.Stuart G. Shanker - 1995 - Minds and Machines 5 (4):561-581.
Insight and the Subject.Eric James Morelli - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):137-148.
The Puzzle of the Subject as Subject in Lonergan.Frederick E. Crowe - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205.
Insight and Strategy in Multiple-Cue Learning.David R. Shanks - 2006 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (2):162-183.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
70 ( #128,936 of 2,309,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #525,368 of 2,309,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature