Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation [Book Review]

Argumentation 16 (1):21-32 (2002)
Words, just because they are words, are not inherently clear. The message they contain becomes clear to those who speak the language and are familiar with the issues and contexts. If the message lacks linguistic clarity the recipient of the message will typically make a query that will bring forth further information intended to clarify. The result might be more words, but it might also involve pointing or drawing, or words that utilize other modes such as references to context, history, and so on. If the ambiguity derives from an inconsistency between, say, words and behaviour, one may look to either mode for clarity. Communication, we must accept, actually occurs in messages, and our ability to transmit information may be limited by any number of factors. When we focus entirely on discursive aspects of communication we limit both the ways in which we receive and ways in which we transmit information. The logocentric fallacy is committed when language, especially in it's most logical guise, is seen to be the only form of rational communication
Keywords coalescent  logocentric  non-logical  situational
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1014991300192
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Knowledge Based Semantics of Messages.Rohit Parikh & Ramaswamy Ramanujam - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):453-467.
A Model for Applying Information and Utility Functions.David Harrah - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (3):267-273.
Hasty Generalization.John Woods - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:221-232.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon.Michael Glanzberg - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):1-29.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
14 ( #344,437 of 2,197,246 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,964 of 2,197,246 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature