Journal of Philosophy 60 (12):627-649 (1993)
This paper challenges the common assumption that an agreement is an exchange of promises. Proposing that the performance obligations of some typical agreements are simultaneous, interdependent, and unconditional, it argues that no promise-exchange has this structure of obligations. In addition to offering general considerations in support of this claim, it examines various types of promise-exchange, showing that none satisfy the criteria noted. Two forms of conditional promise are distinguished and both forms are discussed. A positive account of agreements as joint decisions founded in a joint commitment is sketched. It is argued that the example agreements represent especially clearly the normative structure of social union.
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Who's to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and its Implications for Group Members.Margaret Gilbert - 2006 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (1):94–114.
A Convention or (Tacit) Agreement Betwixt Us: On Reliance and its Normative Consequences.Luca Tummolini, Giulia Andrighetto, Cristiano Castelfranchi & Rosaria Conte - 2013 - Synthese 190 (4):585-618.
Shared Intentions and Shared Responsibility.Brook Jenkins Sadler - 2006 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (1):115–144.
Directed Obligations and the Trouble with Deathbed Promises.Ashley Dressel - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2):323-335.
Similar books and articles
The Agreement to Keep Our Agreements: Hume, Prichard, and Searle.Jan Narveson - 1994 - Philosophical Papers 23 (2):75-87.
Promises and Agreement: Philosophical Essays.Hanoch Sheinman (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #74,509 of 2,164,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,020 of 2,164,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?