- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Lessons from the History and Philosophy of Science regarding the Research Assessment Exercise
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 61:37-73 (2007)
Abstract
The Research Assessment Exercise was introduced in 1986 by Thatcher, and was continued by Blair. So it has now been running for 21 years. During this time, the rules governing the RAE have changed considerably, and the interval between successive RAEs has also varied. These changes are not of great importance as far as the argument of this paper is concerned. We will concentrate on the main features of the RAE which can be summarised as followsAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
(no proxy) - dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [2] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [3] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [4] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [5] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
- cambridge.org [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Who are my peers?: The Research Assessment Exercise in philosophy.Sean Sayers - 1997 - Radical Philosophy 83 (83):2-5.
Metrics-Based Assessments of Research: Incentives for 'Institutional Plagiarism'?Colin Berry - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):337-340.
Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix.Peter Sandøe - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.
The Research Assessment Exercise versus Development in Higher Education: A Response to Richard Pring.Saville Kushner - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (1):5 - 8.
Lessons from the history of science.Nils Roll-Hansen - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):462-466.
Science and values in risk assessment: The case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms. [REVIEW]Soemini Kasanmoentalib - 1996 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1):42-60.
Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.A. Sheikh - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):422-426.
Lessons of history.Will Durant - 2010 - New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. Edited by Ariel Durant.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
71 (#223,072)
6 months
4 (#698,851)
2010-09-02
Downloads
71 (#223,072)
6 months
4 (#698,851)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
From knowledge to wisdom: a revolution in the aims and methods of science.Nicholas Maxwell - 1984 - Oxford: Blackwell.
Mavericks and lotteries.Shahar Avin - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76:13-23.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo