Obligation and Joint Commitment

Utilitas 11 (2):143 (1999)
I argue that obligations of an important type inhere in what I call 'joint commitments'. I propose a joint commitment account of everyday agreements. This could explain why some philosophers believe that we know of the obligating nature of agreements a priori. I compare and contrast obligations of joint commitment with obligations in the relatively narrow sense recommended by H. L. A. Hart, a recommendation that has been influential. Some central contexts in which Hart takes there to be obligations in his sense are contexts in which there are obligations of joint commitment. Nonetheless, different senses of 'obligation' appear to be at issue
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800002399
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Plural Agents.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Noûs 42 (1):17–49.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

204 ( #19,863 of 2,168,605 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #82,741 of 2,168,605 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums