Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction
AbstractSymbolic arithmetic is fundamental to science, technology and economics, but its acquisition by children typically requires years of effort, instruction and drill1,2. When adults perform mental arithmetic, they activate nonsymbolic, approximate number representations3,4, and their performance suffers if this nonsymbolic system is impaired5. Nonsymbolic number representations also allow adults, children, and even infants to add or subtract pairs of dot arrays and to compare the resulting sum or difference to a third array, provided that only approximate accuracy is required6–10. Here we report that young children, who have mastered verbal counting and are on the threshold of arithmetic instruction, can build on their nonsymbolic number system to perform symbolic addition and subtraction11–15. Children across a broad socio-economic spectrum solved symbolic problems involving approximate addition or subtraction of large numbers, both in a laboratory test and in a school setting. Aspects of symbolic arithmetic therefore lie within the reach of children who have learned no algorithms for manipulating numerical symbols. Our findings help to delimit the sources of children’s difficulties learning symbolic arithmetic, and they suggest ways to enhance children’s engagement with formal mathematics. We presented children with approximate symbolic arithmetic problems in a format that parallels previous tests of non-symbolic arithmetic in preschool children8,9. In the first experiment, five- to six-year-old children were given problems such as ‘‘If you had twenty-four stickers and I gave you twenty-seven more, would you have more or less than thirty-five stickers?’’. Children performed well above chance (65.0%, t1952.77, P 5 0.012) without resorting to guessing or comparison strategies that could serve as alternatives to arithmetic. Children who have been taught no symbolic arithmetic therefore have some ability to perform symbolic addition problems. The children’s performance nevertheless fell short of performance on non-symbolic arithmetic tasks using equivalent addition problems with numbers presented as arrays of dots and with the addition operation conveyed by successive motions of the dots into a box (71.3% correct, F1,345 4.26, P 5 0.047)8..
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Ian A. Apperly - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):953-970.
Developmental Trajectory of Number Acuity Reveals a Severe Impairment in Developmental Dyscalculia.Manuela Piazza, Andrea Facoetti, Anna Noemi Trussardi, Ilaria Berteletti, Stefano Conte, Daniela Lucangeli, Stanislas Dehaene & Marco Zorzi - 2010 - Cognition 116 (1):33-41.
Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System.Manuela Piazza, Pierre Pica, Véronique Izard, Elizabeth Spelke & Stanislas Dehaene - 2013 - Psychological Science 24 (4):p.
Neurocognitive Start-Up Tools for Symbolic Number Representations.Manuela Piazza - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (12):542-551.
Similar books and articles
Children’s Understanding of the Relationship Between Addition and Subtraction.Elizabeth Spelke & Camilla Gilmore - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):932-945.
Children’s Understanding of the Relationship Between Addition and Subtraction.Camilla K. Gilmore & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2008 - Cognition 107 (3):932-945.
Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group.Pierre Pica, Cathy Lemer, Véronique Izard & Stanislas Dehaene - 2004 - Science 306 (5695):499-503.
Linguistic Influences on Mathematical Development: How Important is the Transparency of the Counting System?Ann Dowker, Sheila Bala & Delyth Lloyd - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):523 – 538.
Non-Symbolic Arithmetic in Adults and Young Children.Hilary Barth, Kristen La Mont, Jennifer Lipton, Stanislas Dehaene, Nancy Kanwisher & Elizabeth Spelke - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):199-222.
Preschool Children Master the Logic of Number Word Meanings.Jennifer S. Lipton & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):57-66.
Mathematical Roots of Phenomenology: Husserl and the Concept of Number.Mirja Hartimo - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):319-337.
Preschool Children's Mapping of Number Words to Nonsymbolic Numerosities.Elizabeth Spelke - manuscript
Preschool Children's Mapping of Number Words to Nonsymbolic Numerosities.Jennifer S. Lipton & Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
Models of Arithmetic and Upper Bounds for Arithmetic Sets.Alistair H. Lachlan & Robert I. Soare - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):977-983.
The Strength of Nonstandard Methods in Arithmetic.C. Ward Henson, Matt Kaufmann & H. Jerome Keisler - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1039-1058.