Self-Estrangement & Deep Brain Stimulation: Ethical Issues Related to Forced Explantation

Neuroethics 8 (2):107-114 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Although being generally safe, the use of Deep Brain Stimulation has been associated with a significant number of patients experiencing postoperative psychological and neurological harm within experimental trials. A proportion of these postoperative severe adverse effects have lead to the decision to medically prescribe device deactivation or removal. However, there is little debate in the literature as to what is in the patient’s best interest when device removal has been prescribed; in particular, what should be the conceptual approach to ethically guide the decision to remove or maintain implants. The purpose of this article is to examine the ethical issues raised when patients refuse brain device explantation despite medical prescription. In order to illustrate these issues, we report and discuss a clinical case involving a patient suffering from treatment resistant depression who experienced forms of postoperative self-estrangement, as well as suicidal attempts, but who resists giving consent to device explantation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of explantation.Sven Ove Hansson - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-9.


Added to PP

81 (#211,814)

6 months
11 (#271,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederic Gilbert
University of Tasmania