Sherlock Holmes, Crime, and the Anxieties of Globalization

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (4):449-474 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Before the establishment in the early 1800s of France's Sûreté Nationale and England's Scotland Yard, the detection of crimes was generally regarded as supernatural work, but the rise of modern science allowed mere mortals to systematize and categorize events—and thus to solve crimes. Reducing the amount of crime, however, did not reduce the fear of crime, which actually grew in the late-nineteenth century as the result of globalization and media sensationalism. Literary detectives offered an imaginary cure for an imaginary disease. Sherlock Holmes, the most famous literary detective, retained many of the characteristics that earlier ages had attributed to superhuman “detectives”; a wondrous and a social being, he nonetheless was able to reassure an anxious public that even the most heinous crimes could be solved. His ability to calm the fears of the globalizing Victorian era was an early version of what later became a proliferation of imaginary characters serving similar public functions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sherlock Holmes, Crime, and the Anxieties of Globalization.Michael Allen Gillespie & John Samuel Harpham - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (4):449-474.
Not the Crime, but the Man: Sherlock Holmes and Charles Augustus Milverton.David Rozema - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky.
Fictional Characters as Abstract Objects: Some Questions.Reina Hayaki - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):141 - 149.
The Extraordinary Impossibility of Sherlock Holmes.Ben Caplan - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (2):335-355.
Eliminating the impossible: Sherlock Holmes and the supernatural.Kyle Blanchette - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky.
Sherlock holmes ‐ Philosopher detective.Wulf Rehder - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):441-457.
The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes.Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.) - 2012 - University Press of Kentucky.
Sherlock Holmes and the Ethics of Hyperspecialization.Bridget McKenney Costello & Gregory Bassham - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky.
"You know my method": a juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes.Thomas A. Sebeok - 1980 - Bloomington, Ind.: Gaslight Publications. Edited by Donna Jean Umiker-Sebeok.
Passionate Objectivity in Sherlock Holmes.Charles Taliaferro & Michel Le Gall - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky.
Was it morally wrong to kill off Sherlock Holmes?Andrew Terjesen - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky.
A Case of Insincerity: What Does it Mean to Deceive Someone?Kevin Kinghorn - 2012 - In Philip Tallon & David Baggett (eds.), The Philosophy of Sherlock Holmes. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 37-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
6 (#1,383,956)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations