Dissertation, Portland State University (2012)

Authors
Bennett Gilbert
Portland State University
Abstract
The Rococo period in the arts, flourishing mainly from about 1710 to about 1750, was stylistically unified, but nevertheless its tremendous productivity and appeal throughout Occidental culture has proven difficult to explain. Having no contemporary theoretical literature, the Rococo is commonly taken to have been a final and degenerate form of the Baroque era or an extravagance arising from the supposed careless frivolity of the elites, including the intellectuals of the Enlightenment. Neither approach adequately accounts for Rococo style. Naming the Rococo raises profound issues for understanding the relations between conception and production in historical terms. Against the many difficulties that the term has involved in accounting for an immense but elusive cultural movement, this thesis argues that some of the chief philosophical conceptions of the period clarify the particular character and significance of Rococo production. Rococo production is here studied chiefly in decor, architecture, and the plastic arts. This thesis also makes an extended general argument for the value of intellectual history. Rococo style is a group of visual effects of which the central character is atectonicity. This is established by a synthesizing overview of Rococo ornamental motifs. Principal theorists of post-Cartesian thought have failed to see how these distinguish Rococo style from both Baroque and Enlightenment culture. The analysis addresses the historical narratives of Benjamin, Adorno, Foucault, Deleuze, and others about Baroque and Enlightenment culture. The core historical claim of this thesis is that Rococo atectonic effects are visual forms of the anti-materialist, idealist ontology of George Berkeley and of the metaphysics and ontology in the early work of Giambattista Vico. Close readings of important passages from works of both philosophers published in 1710 develop the relationship between atectonics and idealist ontology. Both men rejected the Baroque hierarchical cosmology in favor of finitude as the key to human understanding. The readings center on the issue of causality, including Berkeley’s views of the perfect contingency of the world and on Vico’s theories of truth and ingenium. A reading of Diderot’s critique of the Rococo, which led the reaction to it, shows that he recognized the power of idealist ontology in the Rococo cultural production. The larger force in the rejection of Rococo is the emergence of the sublime as a morally fearful feature of physical nature. Montesquieu’s aesthetic work also shows the transition to a more rigidly determined view of existence, which was expressed but constrained in the little-recognized lattice motif in Rococo arts. The result of these readings is the influence during and after the Rococo period of the concept of continuous creation, in which the memory and imagination of the human subject relays God-given powers of creation into the production of culture. Continuous creation also suggested a human capability to animate material nature. Rococo style displays this as pre-cinematic effects that represent the non-material, non-causal deep structure of reality.
Keywords Berkeley  Vico  Diderot  Montesquieu  idealism  causality  Baroque  Rococo  architecture
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Climate of History: Four Theses.Dipesh Chakrabarty - 2009 - Critical Inquiry 35 (2):197-222.
Narrative Explanation.J. David Velleman - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):1-25.
Constructivism in Metaethics.Carla Bagnoli - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Universals.James Porter Moreland - 2001 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Baroque and Rococo in Latin America.Alfred Neumeyer & Pal Kelemen - 1952 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10 (3):280-280.
The Creation of the Rococo.Fiske Kimball - 1941 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 4 (3/4):119-123.
Rococo to Cubism in Art and Literature.Wylie Sypher - 1961 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (4):484-484.
Rococo and Art Nouveau.Niadi Corina Cernica - 2009 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 1 (1).
Esthetique du Rococo.Remy G. Saisselin - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (2):259-260.
Esthétique du rococo.Ph Minguet - 1981 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 171 (1):122-123.
Minguet . - Esthétique Du Rococo. [REVIEW]P. Somville - 1981 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 171:122.
The Rococo as a Dream of Happiness.Remy G. Saisselin - 1960 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (2):145-152.
Le Rococo Européen: Exposition De Munich 1958.J. Bulla de Villaret - 1959 - Bibliothèque d'Humanisme Et Renaissance 21 (1):231-233.
The Bavarian Rococo Church; Between Faith and Aestheticism.Karsten Harries - 1983 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):455-457.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-20

Total views
2,909 ( #1,324 of 2,519,500 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
115 ( #5,918 of 2,519,500 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes