The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop?

Authors
Frederic Gilbert
University of Tasmania
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180117000640
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,982
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Are Brain-Computer Interface Devices a Form of Internal Coercion?Eran Klein - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):32-34.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Three Kinds of Agency and Closed Loop Neural Devices.Joseph M. Vukov - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):90-91.
What Needs to Emerge to Make You Conscious?Cees van Leeuwen - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):115-136.
Metamind, Autonomy and Materialism.Keith Lehrer - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:1-11.
Metamind, Autonomy and Materialism.Keith Lehrer - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:1-11.
Closed-Loop Theory and Long-Term Retention.Jack A. Adams, Philip H. Marshall & Norman W. Bray - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):242-250.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-07

Total downloads
2 ( #918,503 of 2,274,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #217,244 of 2,274,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature