The Kisceral: Reason and Intuition in Argumentation [Book Review]
Argumentation 25 (2):163-170 (2011)
Gilbert’s four modes of communication include the logical, the emotional, the visceral and the kisceral, which last has not received much attention at all. This mode covers the forms of argument that rely on intuition and undefended basal assumptions. These forms range from the scientific and mathematical to the religious and mystical. In this paper these forms will be examined, and suggestions made for ways in which intuitive frameworks can be compared and valued.
|Keywords||Kisceral Intuition Multi-modal argument Conceptual frameworks|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Multi-Modal Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):159-177.
Liang Shuming and Henri Bergson on Intuition: Cultural Context and the Evolution of Terms.Yanming An - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (3):337-362.
Mathematical Wit and Mathematical Cognition.Andrew Aberdein - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):231-250.
Kant: Making Reason Intuitive.Kyriaki Goudeli, Pavlos Kontos & Iole Patelle (eds.) - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Intuition and Visualization in Mathematical Problem Solving.Valeria Giardino - 2010 - Topoi 29 (1):29-39.
Intuition and Immediacy in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.Andrew Kelley - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:289-298.
Kitcher, Mathematical Intuition, and Experience.Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):227-237.
Is Intuition Based On Understanding?Elijah Chudnoff - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):42-67.
Getting in Touch with Numbers: Intuition and Mathematical Platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):111-125.
Whose Concepts Are They, Anyway? The Role of Philosophical Intuition in Empirical Psychology.Alison Gopnik & Eric Schwitzgebel - 1998 - In M. R. DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 75--91.
Arguing at Cross-Purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation.David Godden - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):219-243.
Added to index2011-05-01
Total downloads31 ( #164,623 of 2,163,731 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,731 )
How can I increase my downloads?