Bioethics 23 (3):183-192 (2009)

Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of the study were to assess similarities and differences between breast cancer patients and their husbands in terms of doctor-patient/spouse relationships and shared decision making; and to investigate the association between breast cancer patients and husbands in terms of preference of type of doctor, doctor-patient relationship, and shared decision making regarding medical treatment. Method: Fifty-seven women with breast cancer, and their husbands, completed questionnaires measuring doctor-patient/spouse relationships, and decision making regarding medical treatment. Results: Patients believe they have a key role in the medical decision-making process and that the participation of their husbands, and their agreement with the decision, is important. Both breast cancer patients and their husbands prefer a shared decision-making process to paternalistic or autonomy-based approaches. Conclusion: In contrast to legal and bioethical approaches, which focus on the patient as the primary decision maker, this study reflects a practical recognition of the role of the breast cancer patient's husband in the decision-making process. It also reflects a relational rather than an individualistic perception of patient autonomy
Keywords patient autonomy  breast cancer patients  doctor‐patient/husband relationships  husband  paternalism  decision making
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00650.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,834
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What About the Family?John Hardwig - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):5-10.
What About the Family?John Hardwig - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):5.
Response To: The Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition.R. Gill - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (12):713-714.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
61 ( #167,294 of 2,426,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #349,733 of 2,426,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes