Vote With Your Fork? Responsibility for Food Justice
Social Philosophy Today 30:113-130 (2014)
Abstract
As popular food writers and activists urge consumers to express their social, political, and ethical commitments through their food choices, the imperative to ‘vote with your fork’ has become a common slogan of emerging food movements in the US. I interrogate the conception of responsibility embedded in this dictate, which has become a de facto model for how to comport ourselves ethically with respect to food. I argue that it implicitly endorses a narrow and problematic understanding of responsibility. To contextualize this claim, I utilize Iris Marion Young’s critique of a “liability model” of responsibility to demonstrate that voting with one’s fork is insufficient as model for taking responsibility for food-related injustices. Instead, I suggest that Young’s social connection model of responsibility is best suited for taking stock of responsibility for food and agriculture related injustices since they are structural and systemic ones. I conclude that although consumer choices and purchases may be important dimensions of our conduct with respect to food and eating, imagining responsibility to be centered on this type of conduct—consumer behavior—is detrimental to attempts to develop a more just food systemAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.5840/socphiltoday20144215
My notes
Similar books and articles
Towards a More Participative Definition of Food Justice.Clement Loo - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (5):787-809.
Seeking Food Justice.Laura M. Hartman - 2013 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 67 (4):396-409.
Responsibility, Desert, and Justice.Carl Knight - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Dilemmas of emergency food: A guide for the perplexed. [REVIEW]Jan Poppendieck - 1994 - Agriculture and Human Values 11 (4):69-76.
From Food Justice to a Tool of the Status Quo: Three Sub-movements Within Local Food.Ian Werkheiser & Samantha Noll - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):201-210.
Growing food justice by planting an anti-oppression foundation: opportunities and obstacles for a budding social movement. [REVIEW]Joshua Sbicca - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (4):455-466.
Serving Social Justice: The Role of the Commons in Sustainable Food Systems.Jennifer Sumner - 2011 - Studies in Social Justice 5 (1):63-75.
Just and Sustainable? Examining the Rhetoric and Potential Realities of UK Food Security.Tom MacMillan & Elizabeth Dowler - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):181-204.
Responsibility and Distributive Justice: An Introduction.Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska Carl - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
To Vote or Not to Vote? An Exploration of the Factors Contributing to the Political Efficacy and Intent to Vote of High School Students.Andrew L. Forrest & Allyson J. Weseley - 2007 - Journal of Social Studies Research 31 (1):3-11.
On fork arrow logic and its expressive power.Paulo A. S. Veloso, Renata P. de Freitas, Petrucio Viana, Mario Benevides & Sheila R. M. Veloso - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):489 - 509.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-04-23
Downloads
69 (#175,817)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2014-04-23
Downloads
69 (#175,817)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
I will never eat another strawberry again: the biopolitics of consumer-citizenship in the fight against methyl iodide in California.Julie Guthman & Sandy Brown - 2016 - Agriculture and Human Values 33 (3):575-585.
Vulnerability, Relationality, and Dependency: Feminist Conceptual Resources for Food Justice.Erinn Cunniff Gilson - 2015 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 8 (2):10-46.
Agency and Autonomy in Food Choice: Can We Really Vote with Our Forks?J. M. Dieterle - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (1):1-15.