Notes on the Methodology and Evolution of Physics and Astrophysics

Russian Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):40-82 (1981)
Work on the methodology of natural science involves serious difficulties over and above those encountered in any other aspect of natural science or of philosophy. Reference is to the obvious fact that in discussing methodological questions of, for example, physics, so as to be precise, it is not enough to know physics: it is also necessary to familiarize oneself with certain branches of philosophy, the history of science, and so forth. Furthermore, a professional cannot limit himself to "general familiarity" with the material. He has to know the details and, if possible, the entire literature on the question under discussion. However, the volume of literature on physics has, within the memory of the author alone — that is, over approximately forty years — multiplied dozens of times. I cannot say how great has been the increase in the quantity of information on the methodology of natural science and related disciplines. But what is important is that the amount of material that has accumulated to date is enormous. Some notion of the scale of the work may be gained from the abstract journal Obshchestvennye nauki za rubezhom. Seriia 8. Naukovedenie. For example, no. 1 for 1980 contained abstracts of 72 articles and books; this amounts to over 400 titles a year . When we add to this the Soviet literature and the need to include material from many years, we arrive at a figure of four digits. Naturally, only a very small portion of the literature is made use of in any particular piece of work, but it is impossible to know beforehand which items will be specifically needed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2753/RSP1061-1967200140
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,824
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What Is and Why Do We Need Philosophy of Physics?Meinard Kuhlmann & Wolfgang Pietsch - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):209-214.
Pragmatic Unification, Observation and Realism in Astroparticle Physics.Brigitte Falkenburg - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):327-345.
New Methods for Streamlining Theory Building.Kenneth Bausch - 2002 - World Futures 58 (2 & 3):229 – 240.
Aus der Frühzeit der (Deutschen) Physikalischen Gesellschaft: Gründung, Struktur, Interdisziplinarität.Wolfgang Schreier - 1995 - NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 3 (1):23-34.
The Methodology of Pierre Duhem.Armand Lowinger - 1941 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Status of General Relativity.W. B. Bonnor - 1969 - Guernsey, C.I.]F. Hodgson.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #648,786 of 2,178,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums