"Please, don't let me be misunderstood": The role of argumentation in a sociology of academic misunderstandings

Social Epistemology 21 (4):369 – 389 (2007)
Abstract
Academic debates are so frequent and omnipresent in most disciplines, particularly the social sciences and humanities, it seems obvious that disagreements are bound to occur. The aim of this paper is to show that whereas the agent who perceives his/her contribution as being misunderstood locates the origin of the communication problem on the side of the receiver who "misinterprets" the text, the emitter is in fact also contributing to the possibility of this misunderstanding through the very manner in which his/her text is written. In other words, I propose a symmetric approach to understanding misunderstandings: taking simultaneously into account the position of the reader in the scientific field and the structure of the texts of the writers. The paper thus proposes to complement the sociological analysis of controversies in a scientific field with the close reading of texts, a practice usually found in studies of argumentation, in order to explain the occurrence of misunderstandings. The debate surrounding the charge of "relativism" among sociologists of scientific knowledge provides us with a case study to analyse in detail the argumentative context of misunderstanding.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720701746607
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Science of Science and Reflexivity.Pierre Bourdieu - 2004 - University of Chicago Press.
Remembering.F. C. Bartlett - 1935 - Scientia 29 (57):221.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Response to Collins About 'One Point' That is Absent From My Review of His Book.Yves Gingras - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):112-.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #175,710 of 2,193,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,980 of 2,193,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature