Social Epistemology 21 (4):369 – 389 (2007)

Authors
Abstract
Academic debates are so frequent and omnipresent in most disciplines, particularly the social sciences and humanities, it seems obvious that disagreements are bound to occur. The aim of this paper is to show that whereas the agent who perceives his/her contribution as being misunderstood locates the origin of the communication problem on the side of the receiver who "misinterprets" the text, the emitter is in fact also contributing to the possibility of this misunderstanding through the very manner in which his/her text is written. In other words, I propose a symmetric approach to understanding misunderstandings: taking simultaneously into account the position of the reader in the scientific field and the structure of the texts of the writers. The paper thus proposes to complement the sociological analysis of controversies in a scientific field with the close reading of texts, a practice usually found in studies of argumentation, in order to explain the occurrence of misunderstandings. The debate surrounding the charge of "relativism" among sociologists of scientific knowledge provides us with a case study to analyse in detail the argumentative context of misunderstanding.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720701746607
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Mangle of Practice.Andrew Pickering & Jed Z. Buchwald - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):479-482.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Response to Collins About 'One Point' That is Absent From My Review of His Book.Yves Gingras - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):112-.
Naming Without Necessity.Yves Gingras - 2010 - Revue de Synthèse 131 (3):439-454.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
47 ( #197,583 of 2,326,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #435,731 of 2,326,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes