Journal of the History of Biology 43 (1):159-181 (2010)

The object of this paper is two-fold: first, to show that contrary to what seem to have become a widely accepted view among historians of biology, the famous 1953 first Nature paper of Watson and Crick on the structure of DNA was widely cited — as compared to the average paper of the time — on a continuous basis from the very year of its publication and over the period 1953–1970 and that the citations came from a wide array of scientific journals. A systematic analysis of the bibliometric data thus shows that Watson's and Crick's paper did in fact have immediate and long term impact if we define "impact" in terms of comparative citations with other papers of the time. In this precise sense it did not fall into "relative oblivion" in the scientific community. The second aim of this paper is to show, using the case of the reception of the Watson—Crick and Jacob—Monod papers as concrete examples, how large scale bibliometric data can be used in a sophisticated manner to provide information about the dynamic of the scientific field as a whole instead of limiting the analysis to a few major actors and generalizing the result to the whole community without further ado
Keywords DNA  J.D. Watson  Francis Crick  bibliometrics  co-citation mapping  citation analysis  scientific impact  Jacques Monod  François Jacob
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-009-9183-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
Science of Science and Reflexivity.Pierre Bourdieu - 2004 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Chemical Characterization of the Gene: Vicissitudes of Evidential Assessment.Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):105-127.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communication scientifique : pour le meilleur et le PEER.Laurent Romary - 2010 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 57 (2):131.
El tiempo en San Agustín.Gemma Muñoz-Alonso López - 1989 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 7:37-42.
Reflexión sobre «La antropología fenomenológica de M. Merleau-Ponty.Gemma Muñoz-Alonso López - 1996 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 1 (13):65-73.
Genetic Prophecy: Beyond the Double Helix.D. Mitchell - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):215-215.
Rosy and Jim: The Mystery of the Double Helix.Bernard S. Strauss - 2004 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 (3):443-448.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #321,666 of 2,326,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes