Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):53-73 (1992)

Authors
Carl Ginet
Cornell University
Abstract
The paper explicates a version of dispositionalism and defends it against Kripke's objections (in his "Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language") that 1) it leaves out the normative aspect of a rule, 2) it cannot account for the directness of the knowledge one has of what one meant, and 3) regarding rules for computable functions of numbers, a) there are numbers beyond one's capacity to consider and b) there are people who are disposed to make systematic mistakes in computing values of functions they understand perfectly well.
Keywords Epistemology  Meaning  Rule  Kripke, S  Wittgenstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1992.tb00142.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cause and Effect: Intuitive Awareness.L. Wittgenstein - 1976 - Philosophia 6 (3-4):409-425.
Scepticism and Semantic Knowledge.Graeme R. Forbes - 1984 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 84:223-37.
XIII—Scepticism and Semantic Knowledge.Graeme Forbes - 1984 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 84 (1):223-240.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Killing Kripkenstein's Monster.Jared Warren - 2020 - Noûs 54 (2):257-289.
Kripke’s Normativity Argument.José L. Zalabardo - 1997 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):467-488.
Interaction and Self-Correction.Glenda L. Satne - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
158 ( #63,753 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #214,792 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes