Mind and Society 10 (2):97-102 (2011)
Behavioral economics has rejuvenated economic theory and deepened the bonds between economic theory and the other social sciences. Neoclassical economics does not depend on individual preferences being self-regarding. Moreover, in market contexts, laboratory experiments indicate that traditional theory works well. Behavioral economic findings thus enrich and expand neoclassical economics rather than undermining it. In particular, social norms are an emergent property of human sociality, and exist as macrosocial structures that are not reducible to the preferences of individuals. Behavioral economists are not theorists, but rather experimentalists. With few exceptions, they do not provide, nor aim to provide, cogent models for the phenomena they discover. Far from downplaying “inconvenient facts,” as is the practice of traditional economic theory, behavioral economists relish finding novel forms of individual decision-making and strategic behavior
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies.Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr & Herbert Gintis (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Contribution of Game Theory to Experimental Design in the Behavioral Sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):411-412.
Towards the Unity of the Human Behavioral Sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57.
A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
The Game-Theoretic Innocence of Experimental Behavioral Psychology.Don Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
The Context Problematic, Behavioral Economics and the Transactional View: An Introduction to 'John Dewey and Economic Theory'.Elias L. Khalil - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (2):107-130.
Behavioral Momentum and Behavioral Economic Metaphors for Excessive Consumption.Rudy E. Vuchinich - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):114-115.
Wilde Heuristics and Rum Tum Tuggers: Preference Indeterminacy and Instability.Mark Alfano - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):5-15.
Beyond Rationality: Rigor Without Mortis in Game Theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):180-192.
Review Essay: Is Homo Economics Extinct?R. Sassower - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):603-615.
The 'Materials' of Experimental Economics: Technological Versus Behavioral Experiments.Ana C. Santos - 2007 - Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):311-337.
Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.
Love is Not Enough: Other-Regarding Preferences Cannot Explain Payoff Dominance in Game Theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):22-23.
Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory.Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):421-438.
Added to index2011-10-11
Total downloads25 ( #205,443 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?