Towards the unity of the human behavioral sciences
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):37-57 (2004)
Abstract
Despite their distinct objects of study, the human behavioral sciences all include models of individual human behavior. Unity in the behavioral sciences requires that there be a common underlying model of individual human behavior, specialized and enriched to meet the particular needs of each discipline. Such unity does not exist, and cannot be easily attained, since the various disciplines have incompatible models and disparate research methodologies. Yet recent theoretical and empirical developments have created the conditions for unity in the behavioral sciences, incorporating core principles from all fields, and based upon theoretical tools (game theory and the rational actor model) and data gathering techniques (experimental games in the laboratory and field) that transcend disciplinary boundaries. This article sketches a set of principles aimed at fostering such a unity. Key Words: behavioral science • game theory • experimental economics • rational actor model.DOI
10.1177/1470594x04040188
My notes
Similar books and articles
Do the cognitive and behavioral sciences need each other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
Game theory for reformation of behavioral science based on a mistake.Jeffrey Foss - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):24-25.
Rationality versus program-based behavior.Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):29-30.
Against the unification of the behavioral sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
The game-theoretic innocence of experimental behavioral psychology.Don Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
An Evidence-Based Study of the Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.Edouard Machery & Kara Cohen - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):177-226.
Reduction, integration, and the unity of science: Natural, behavioral, and social sciences and the humanities.William P. Bechtel & Andrew Hamilton - 2007 - In T. Kuipers (ed.), Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues (Volume 1 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science). Elsevier.
Toward a Theory of Human History.Joseph Margolis - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273.
A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
34 (#345,525)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2009-01-28
Downloads
34 (#345,525)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Evolutionary game theory and the normative theory of institutional design: Binmore and behavioral economics.Don Ross - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):51-79.
Economics, Psychology, and the Unity of the Decision Sciences.Roberto Fumagalli - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (2):103-128.
The Foundations of Behavior: The Beliefs, Preferences, and Constraints Model.Herbert Gintis - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (2):123-127.
Paving the Way for an Evolutionary Social Constructivism.Andreas De Block & Bart Du Laing - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (4):337-348.
Definitional Argument in Evolutionary Psychology and Cultural Anthropology.John P. Jackson - 2010 - Science in Context 23 (1):121-150.