Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (2):115-134 (2013)
The present paper attempts to show that a 1915 article by Erich Kretschmann must be credited not only for being the source of Einstein's point-coincidence, but also for having anticipated the main lines of the logical-empiricist interpretation of general relativity. Whereas Kretschmann was inspired by the work of Mach and Poincaré, Einstein inserted Kretschmann's point-coincidence parlance into the context of Ricci and Levi-Civita's absolute differential calculus. Kretschmann himself realized this and turned the point-coincidence argument against Einstein in his second and more famous 1918 paper. While Einstein had taken nothing from Kretschmann but the expression “point-coincidences”, the logical empiricists, however, instinctively dragged along with it the entire apparatus of Kretschmann's conventionalism. Disappointingly, in their interpretation of general relativity, the logical empiricists unwittingly replicated some epistemological remarks Kretschmann had written before general relativity even existed
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist.Paul Arthur Schilpp & Albert Einstein - 1950 - Science and Society 14 (4):353-360.
Thoroughly Modern Mctaggart: Or, What Mctaggart Would Have Said If He Had Read the General Theory of Relativity.John Earman - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2 (3):1-28.
Origins of Logical Empiricism.Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) - 1996 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Talking at Cross-Purposes: How Einstein and the Logical Empiricists Never Agreed on What They Were Disagreeing About.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Synthese 190 (17):3819-3863.
‘But One Must Not Legalize the Mentioned Sin’: Phenomenological Vs. Dynamical Treatments of Rods and Clocks in Einstein׳s Thought.Marco Giovanelli - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48:20-44.
Similar books and articles
Erich Kretschmann as a Proto-Logical-Empiricist: Adventures and Misadventures of the Point-Coincidence Argument.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (2):115-134.
Leibniz-Äquivalenz vs. Einstein-Äquivalenz. Was man von der Logisch-Empiristischen Interpretation des Punkt-Koinzidenz-Arguments lernen kann.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Philosophia Naturalis 50 (1):115-164.
Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist.Carl G. Hempel - 1975 - In Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 1--14.
'That Sort of Everyday Image of Logical Positivism': Thomas Kuhn and the Decline of Logical Empiricist Philosophy of Science.Alan Richardson - 2007 - In A. Richardson & T. Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 346--370.
The Skeptical Argument From Error.Robert A. Imlay - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:119-124.
Spinoza and the Philosophy of Immanence: Reflections on Yovel's the Adventures of Immanence.Henry E. Allison - 1992 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):55 – 67.
On Continuity: Aristotle Versus Topology?Michael J. White - 1988 - History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):1-12.
The Overgeneration Argument(S): A Succinct Refutation.A. C. Paseau - 2014 - Analysis 74 (1):ant097.
The Overgeneration Argument(S): A Succinct Refutation.A. C. Paseau - 2014 - Analysis 74 (1):40-47.
Added to index2014-01-23
Total downloads15 ( #315,800 of 2,171,705 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,705 )
How can I increase my downloads?