Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument

Abstract
The present paper attempts to show that a 1915 article by Erich Kretschmann must be credited not only for being the source of Einstein's point-coincidence, but also for having anticipated the main lines of the logical-empiricist interpretation of general relativity. Whereas Kretschmann was inspired by the work of Mach and Poincaré, Einstein inserted Kretschmann's point-coincidence parlance into the context of Ricci and Levi-Civita's absolute differential calculus. Kretschmann himself realized this and turned the point-coincidence argument against Einstein in his second and more famous 1918 paper. While Einstein had taken nothing from Kretschmann but the expression “point-coincidences”, the logical empiricists, however, instinctively dragged along with it the entire apparatus of Kretschmann's conventionalism. Disappointingly, in their interpretation of general relativity, the logical empiricists unwittingly replicated some epistemological remarks Kretschmann had written before general relativity even existed
Keywords pra
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.11.004
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Origins of Logical Empiricism.Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) - 1996 - Univ of Minnesota Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Case for Lorentzian Relativity.Daniel Shanahan - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (4):349-367.
‘But One Must Not Legalize the Mentioned Sin’: Phenomenological Vs. Dynamical Treatments of Rods and Clocks in Einstein׳s Thought.Marco Giovanelli - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48:20-44.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Erich Kretschmann as a Proto-Logical-Empiricist: Adventures and Misadventures of the Point-Coincidence Argument.Marco Giovanelli - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (2):115-134.
How Coincidence Bears on Persistence.Pablo Rychter - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (4):759-770.
Book Review. [REVIEW]G. Aldo Antonelli - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (2):217-28.
The Skeptical Argument From Error.Robert A. Imlay - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:119-124.
Spinoza and the Philosophy of Immanence: Reflections on Yovel's the Adventures of Immanence.Henry E. Allison - 1992 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):55 – 67.
On Continuity: Aristotle Versus Topology?Michael J. White - 1988 - History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):1-12.
Desgabets as a Cartesian Empiricist.Monte Cook - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2014-01-23

Total downloads

15 ( #315,800 of 2,171,705 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,705 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums