Facts, Values and the Psychology of the Human Person

The notion of value neutrality has been a contentious issue within the human and social sciences for some time. In this paper, some of the philosophical and scientific bases for the confusion surrounding the fact-value dichotomy are covered and the discrepancy between how psychology studies values and expresses them is noted. The sense of value neutrality is clarified historically and the clarified meaning of the term applied to some qualitative data demonstrating in what sense values may be expressed in psychology. The position is upheld that psychology as a human science intentionally should not be absolutely value free in the sense that human reality has to be studied in a non-reductionistic manner and thus methods of study must be respectful of the full ethical sense of humanness. This is simply meeting the phenomenological requirement of “fidelity to the phenomenon”. However, psychology can be value free in the historical sense of the term properly understood because it refers to the fact that the personal values of the scientists ought not to be conflated with scientific findings. The discussion of values takes place primarily within the context of science, where the problem of value neutrality emerged, but it is acknowledged that non-scientific approaches to value have merit and can also be compelling.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/20797222.2006.11433931
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity.D. W. Hamlyn & Charles Taylor - 1991 - British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (1):101.
The Moral Judgement of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):373-374.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary & George Edward Moore - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.
The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method.Amedeo Giorgi - 2012 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 43 (1):3-12.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Psychology's Facts and Values: A Perennial Entanglement.Svend Brinkmann - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (6):749 – 765.
Facts, Values and the Psychology of the Human Person.Amedeo Giorgi - 2006 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology: Methodology: Special Edition 6:p - 1.
Is Nietzsche a Naturalist?: Or How to Become a Responsible Plant. Lemm - 2016 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 47 (1):61-80.
The Place of Facts in a World of Values: Subject and Object in a Postmodern World.Robert J. Smith - 2001 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):153-172.
Creating Facts and Values.Ruth Anna Putnam - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (232):187-204.
Is Objectivity Possible?: Can Introspection Help?Rudi Anders - 2016 - Australian Humanist, The 120:17.
Wolfgang Köhler on Facts and Values.Riccardo Martinelli - 2015 - Dialogue and Universalism 25 (4):61-76.
Human Rights and Concept of Person.Barbara de Mori - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):159-169.
Values as Constraints on Affordances: Perceiving and Acting Properly.Bert H. Hodges & Reuben M. Baron - 1992 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (3):263–294.
Metaphysical Accounts of the Zygote as a Person and the Veto Power of Facts.Thomas J. Bole - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):647-653.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #897,934 of 2,273,208 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #563,270 of 2,273,208 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature