Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 33 (1):1-18 (2002)
It seems that many qualitative researchers have still not contextualized the role of validity in qualitative analysis.This article enumerates three factors that must be taken into account: The philosophy of science within which one works, the discipline to which one belongs, and the subfield of specialization that one pursues. Most researchers have encountered the question of validity within the context of empirical science, but validity does not have the same role within a phenomenological philosophy of science. Within the discipline of psychology, certain subfields ignore the validity issue for good reasons and other subfields specialize in developing strategies for validity. This article analyzes the reasons that the specialty of "test construction" focuses so strongly on validity issues and concludes that phenomenological qualitative research is not at all similar to the situation one finds in test construction. Rather, phenomenological qualitative research is closer to experimental situations and so the validity issue is not as pressing as is often supposed. The article ends with two different Husserlian perspectives on a theory of knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley - manuscript
The Case for Fiction as Qualitative Research: Towards a Non-Referential Ground for Meaning.Stijn Mus - 2012 - Ethics and Education 7 (2):137-148.
Description Versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research.Amedeo Giorgi - 1992 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 23 (2):119-135.
Reasoning with Qualitative Velocity: Towards a Hybrid Approach.Joanna Golinska-Pilarek & Emilio Munoz Velasco - 2012 - In Emilio Corchado, Vaclav Snasel, Ajith Abraham, Michał Woźniak, Manuel Grana & Sung-Bae Cho (eds.), Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. Springer. pp. 635--646.
Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research.Thomas Hadjistavropoulos & William E. Smythe - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):163 – 174.
A Phenomenological Perspective on Certain Qualitative Research Methods.Amedeo Giorgi - 1994 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 25 (2):190-220.
Qualitative Health Research and the Irb: Answering the “so What?” With Qualitative Inquiry. [REVIEW]Mary Ellen Macdonald & Franco A. Carnevale - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):1-5.
Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide.Pamela S. Maykut - 1994 - Falmer Press.
The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure.Amedeo Giorgi - 1997 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 28 (2):235-260.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research.Jonathan A. Smith - 2009 - Sage Publications.
Ethics and the Internet Issues Associated with Qualitative Research.Denise E. DeLorme, George M. Sinkhan & Warren French - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):271 - 286.
Qualitative Research in Midwifery and Childbirth Phenomenological Approaches.Gill Thomson, Fiona Dykes & Soo Downe (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads430 ( #5,249 of 2,169,146 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #35,180 of 2,169,146 )
How can I increase my downloads?