Neuroethics 6 (2):411-414 (2013)
Using a metaphorical reminiscence upon holiday toys - and the hopes, challenges and possibilities they presented - this essay addresses the ways that the heuristics, outcomes and products of neuroscience have effected change in the human condition, predicament, and being. A note of caution is offered to pragmatically assess what can be done with neurotechnology, what can't, and what should and shouldn't - based upon the capacities and limitations of both the science, and our collective ability to handle knowledge, power and the unknown. This is not an appeal to impede brain research. To the contrary, it is a call to engage neuroethics as a discipline and set of practices 1) to allow a deeper, more finely-grained understanding of brains and their functions in ecological dynamics (that we define as morality and ethics), and 2) to intuit how to engage neuroscientific research and its applications in the social sphere (inclusive of medicine, public life and national agenda), to more accurately perceive how neuroscience is changing human society and the human being, and to instantiate more relevant ethics and laws that are in step with advancing epistemological capital and technological capability
|Keywords||Neuroethics Neurotechnology Morality Policy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing.Robyn Bluhm - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
Neuroscience for Educators: What Are They Seeking, and What Are They Finding?Cayce Hook & Martha Farah - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (2):331-341.
The Ethics of Neuroeducation: Research, Practice and Policy. [REVIEW]Bruce Maxwell & Eric Racine - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (2):101-103.
The Neuroscience of Pain, and a Neuroethics of Pain Care.James Giordano - 2010 - Neuroethics 3 (1):89-94.
Neuroeducation–a Critical Overview of an Emerging Field.Daniel Ansari, Bert de Smedt & Roland Grabner - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (2):105-117.
Neurotechnology, Invasiveness and the Extended Mind.Tom Buller - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (3):593-605.
Neuroethics.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Vilayanur Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 3e. Elsevier.
Minimally Conscious State, Human Dignity, and the Significance of Species: A Reply to Kaczor.Jukka Varelius - 2011 - Neuroethics (Browse Results) 6 (1):85-95.
Will Neuroscientific Discoveries About Free Will and Selfhood Change Our Ethical Practices?Chris Kaposy - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (1):51-59.
The Neurotechnological Cerebral Subject: Persistence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Norms in a Network of Change. [REVIEW]Sigrid Schmitz - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):261-274.
Further Thoughts on Counterfactuals, Compatibilism, Conceptual Mismatches, and Choices: Response to Commentaries.Roy F. Baumeister, A. William Crescioni & Jessica L. Alquist - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (1):31-34.
Ethical Considerations in the Framing of the Cognitive Enhancement Debate.Simon Outram - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (2):173-184.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads39 ( #134,036 of 2,178,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?