Journal of Business Ethics 178 (4):1027-1041 (2022)
AbstractSeveral technological developments, such as self-service technologies and artificial intelligence, are disrupting the retailing industry by changing consumption and purchase habits and the overall retail experience. Although AI represents extraordinary opportunities for businesses, companies must avoid the dangers and risks associated with the adoption of such systems. Integrating perspectives from emerging research on AI, morality of machines, and norm activation, we examine how individuals morally behave toward AI agents and self-service machines. Across three studies, we demonstrate that consumers’ moral concerns and behaviors differ when interacting with technologies versus humans. We show that moral intention is less likely to emerge for AI checkout and self-checkout machines compared with human checkout. In addition, moral intention decreases as people consider the machine less humanlike. We further document that the decline in morality is caused by less guilt displayed toward new technologies. The non-human nature of the interaction evokes a decreased feeling of guilt and ultimately reduces moral behavior. These findings offer insights into how technological developments influence consumer behaviors and provide guidance for businesses and retailers in understanding moral intentions related to the different types of interactions in a shopping environment.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Minds, Brains, and Programs.John Searle - 1980 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.
Robots Should Be Slaves.Joanna J. Bryson - 2010 - In Yorick Wilks (ed.), Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. pp. 63-74.
Artificial virtue: the machine question and perceptions of moral character in artificial moral agents.Patrick Gamez, Daniel B. Shank, Carson Arnold & Mallory North - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (4):795-809.
Citations of this work
Guest Editorial: Business Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Michael Haenlein, Ming-Hui Huang & Andreas Kaplan - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 178 (4):867-869.
Similar books and articles
Re-Creating the Philosopher’s Mind: Artificial Life From Artificial Intelligence.Maurice H. T. Ling - 2012 - Human-Level Intelligence 2:1.
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.John-Stewart Gordon, and & Sven Nyholm - 2021 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise.Paul Dumouchel - 2019 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 24 (2):241-258.
Artificial Intelligence and the Body: Dreyfus, Bickhard, and the Future of AI.Daniel Susser - 2013 - In Vincent C. Müller (ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer. pp. 277-287.
Artificial Systems with Moral Capacities? A Research Design and its Implementation in a Geriatric Care System.Catrin Misselhorn - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 278:103179.
Artificial Consciousness or Artificial Intelligence.Florin Spanache - 2016 - Dialogo 3 (2):135-143.
N.J. Nilsson, Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis T. Dean, J. Allen and Y. Aloimonos, Artificial Intelligence: Theory and Practice D. Poole, A. Mackworth and R. Goebel, Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. [REVIEW]Benedict du Boulay - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence 125 (1-2):227-232.
Artificial Intelligence, Religion, and Community Concern.Matt J. Rossano - 2001 - Zygon 36 (1):57-75.
An Intermediate Stage of Artificial Intelligence Similar to Human.Koval A. - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence Scientific Journal 25 (1):7-12.