Journal of Critical Realism 11 (1):40-75 (2012)

Authors
Fabio Gironi
Cardiff University
Abstract
This paper questions and criticizes the employment of critical realism in the field of ‘science and religion’. Referring to the texts of four main actors in this field, I demonstrate how the choice of critical realism is justified by a (disguised) apologetic interest in defending the epistemic privilege of the theological enterprise against that of the natural sciences. I argue that this is possible thanks to the reactivation of ‘theological potential’ latent in some under-examined assumptions and conceptual structures still at work within philosophy of science and scientific epistemology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1558/jcr.v11i1.40
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction to the Special Issue: Normativity.Leigh Price - 2019 - Journal of Critical Realism 18 (3):221-238.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-16

Total views
79 ( #128,368 of 2,420,820 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,362 of 2,420,820 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes