After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):261-263 (2013)
Abstract
Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled
Keywords Humans   Abortion, Induced   Mothers   Morals   Fetal Viability   Homicide   Infanticide   Adoption   Ethical Analysis   Moral Obligations   Personhood
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
If Abortion, Then Infanticide.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (5):387-409.
A Bioethics for All Seasons.S. Chan - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):17-21.
What's the Point of Philosophical Bioethics?Iain Brassington - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
Rituals of Knowing: Rejection and Relation in Disability Theology and Meister Eckhart.Daniel G. W. Smith - forthcoming - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology:1-16.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Right to Parent One's Biological Baby.Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (4):432-455.
The Moral Significance of Birth.Mary Anne Warren - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):46 - 65.
Innocence and Consequentialism.Jacqueline A. Laing - 1997 - In David S. Oderberg & Jacqueline A. Laing (eds.), Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics. Macmillan. pp. 196--224.
Autonomy and the Partial-Birth Abortion Act.Marina Oshana - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1):46-60.
Jthe Birth of Difference.Christina Schües - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (2):243-252.
Abortion, Society, and the Law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Acceptability in France of Induced Abortion for Adolescents. Mar - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):26 – 32.
Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants.A. G. M. Campbell - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):212-213.
Adoption is Not Abortion-Lite.Lindsey Porter - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):63-78.
Added to PP index
2012-02-24

Total downloads
319 ( #10,581 of 2,210,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #5,954 of 2,210,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature