Philosophy 21 (78):5 - 28 (1946)
The history of Natural Philosophy is dominated by a paradox; broadly speaking, a vast increase in its range of application to the external world has been accompanied by a sweeping simplification in its basic assumptions. From the standpoint of Empiricism this dual development appears utterly mysterious. On the other hand, Rationalism, which seeks to demonstrate the metaphysical necessity of natural law, and hence might throw light on this development, has been generally discredited, particularly by men of science. It is not surprising, therefore, that philosophical discussion of scientific method has become a Babel of confusing tongues
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Epistemological Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Deconstructionist View of the Controversy.Donald L. Carveth - 1987 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 17 (1):97-115.
Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.Alexander Paseau - 2008 - In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre.Johann Gottlieb Fichte - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Epistemological Dilemmas of Contemporary Ethics.Harun Tepe - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:25-30.
Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations.Ingo Brigandt - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):77-97.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads4 ( #648,718 of 2,178,111 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,111 )
How can I increase my downloads?