An intensional Leibniz semantics for aristotelian logic

Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):262-272 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since Freges terms were meant to refer always to sets, that is, entities composed of individuals. Classical philosophy up to Leibniz and Kant had a different view on this questionBegriffes syntaxhighercorresponding to the idea which Leibniz used in the construction of his characteristic numbers. Thus, this paper is an addendum to Corcorans theory via predicate logic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 78,037

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-04

Downloads
121 (#108,812)

6 months
2 (#327,670)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Semantics: Volume 1.John Lyons - 1977 - Cambridge University Press.
What is a syllogism?Timothy J. Smiley - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):136 - 154.
Completeness of an ancient logic.John Corcoran - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):696-702.

View all 16 references / Add more references