Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge

Neuroethics 4 (3):191-194 (2011)
In “Minds, Brains, and Norms,” Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson claim that the idea that ‘you are your brain’ does not contribute to a plausible account of human behavior. I argue that they leave too little of the brain in their account of different types of behavior
Keywords Brain  Mind  Behavior  Empirical explanations  Conceptual explanations  Wittgenstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-010-9081-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,711
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Materialism and the Mediated Causation of Behavior.Crawford L. Elder - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 103 (2):165-75.
The Basic Questions: What is Reinforced? What is Selected?Patrick Grim - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):261-261.
Structuring an Emotional World.Jordan Grafman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):200-201.
What Neuropsychology Tells Us About Consciousness.Ran Lahav - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (1):67-85.
Free Choice and the Human Brain.Richard E. Passingham & Hakwan C. Lau - 2006 - In Susan Pockett, William P. Banks & Shaun Gallagher (eds.), Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? MIT Press. pp. 53-72.
Why Behavior Should Matter to Linguists.A. Charles Catania - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):670-672.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

57 ( #87,817 of 2,146,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #279,805 of 2,146,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums