Brain, Behavior, and Knowledge

Neuroethics 4 (3):191-194 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Minds, Brains, and Norms,” Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson claim that the idea that ‘you are your brain’ does not contribute to a plausible account of human behavior. I argue that they leave too little of the brain in their account of different types of behavior

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free choice and the human brain.Richard E. Passingham & Hakwan C. Lau - 2006 - In Susan Pockett, William P. Banks & Shaun Gallagher (eds.), Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? MIT Press. pp. 53-72.
What neuropsychology tells us about consciousness.Ran Lahav - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (1):67-85.
Structuring an emotional world.Jordan Grafman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):200-201.
The basic questions: What is reinforced? What is selected?Patrick Grim - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):261-261.
Why behavior should matter to linguists.A. Charles Catania - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):670-672.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-30

Downloads
74 (#203,030)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Neuroscience of rule-guided behavior.Silvia A. Bunge & Jonathan D. Wallis (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.

Add more references