Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):551-552 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the case of the minimally conscious patient M, the English Court of Protection ruled that it would be unlawful to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from her. The Court reasoned that the sanctity of life was the determining factor and that it would not be in M's best interests for ANH to be withdrawn. This paper argues that the Court's reasoning is flawed and that continued ANH was not in this patient's best interests and thus should have been withdrawn



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of morphing.Caspar Hare - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (1):111 - 130.
The minimally conscious state and treatment withdrawal: W v M.Emily Jackson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):559-561.


Added to PP

62 (#260,913)

6 months
11 (#241,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?