Ethics 88 (4):361-368 (1978)
In what follows, I shall first outline Broad's description of, and attitude to, psychological egoism. Then, I shall examine briefly the form which a defense against his criticisms might take. This raises the query whether such a defense is consistent with the doctrine's empirical character. It is suggested that the egoist could evade this difficulty by questioning an assumption which Broad (and others) make about psychological egoism. By abandoning this assumption, we can state the doctrine in a more adequate form-a form which emphasizes the point that men, although psychological egoists, are also rational beings, capable of acting on principle!
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Psychological Egoism: A Note on Professor Lemos' Discussion.Donald Clark Hodges - 1961 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (2):246-248.
A Short Way With Psychological Egoism.Kai Nielsen - 1973 - Journal of Social Philosophy 4 (2):15-16.
Relational Desires and Empirical Evidence Against Psychological Egoism.Joshua May - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):39–58.
Psychological Egoism and Its Critics.Mark Mercer - 1998 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):557-576.
What Truth is There in Psychological Egoism?Charles Sayward - 2006 - Facta Philosophica 8 (1-2):145-159.
On the Relation Between Psychological and Ethical Egoism.Bruce Russell - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (1):91-99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads287 ( #10,629 of 2,158,435 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,773 of 2,158,435 )
How can I increase my downloads?