Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):439-440 (2004)
Dr Andorno and I have corresponded for some time on the question of a right not to know information. I enjoyed reading his paper and I am struck by the degree of agreement that we share. We both agree—for example, that unsolicited knowledge can be a burden which can significantly compromise an individual’s psychological integrity. We both share a desire to respect individual self determination. Also we each consider it reasonable for individuals to choose not to receive potentially harmful information. I have already made these arguments, and more, elsewhere,1 but my starting point has not been autonomy, as advocated by Andorno, but rather privacy. In essence, my argument is that individuals enjoy, and are entitled to enjoy, a measure of psychological privacy which can be invaded by unwarranted disclosures of information.The reason that I prefer privacy to autonomy is not because I have any wish to “deny people the right to self determination”2 but rather because I perceive deficiencies in the autonomy model. Indeed, my approach and that of Andorno are not mutually exclusive; it is simply that my approach is broader and encompasses some of the harder cases which an autonomy based approach cannot help us to resolve. Thus, most of the substance of Andorno’s approach is subsumed within my model. I have—for example, no disagreement whatsoever with the view that if you have an indication that an individual would not wish to know then this wish should be respected. One might even establish novel means of discerning individuals’ wishes by establishing a register to record advance refusals, as Andorno …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2003.007260
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,528
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Al-Mahani's Commentary on the Concept of Ratio.Bijan Vahabzadeh - 2002 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (1):9-52.
Philosophical Commentary.Gerhard Seel - 2001 - In Gerhard Seel, Jean-Pierre Schneider, Daniel Schulthess, Mario Mignucci & Ammonius (eds.), Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary, and Essays. De Gruyter.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
2 ( #959,961 of 2,302,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #430,168 of 2,302,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature