In Defense of a Four-part Theory: Replies to Hardimon, Haslanger, Mallon, and Zack


Authors
Joshua Glasgow
Sonoma State University
Abstract
Replies to Michael Hardimon, Sally Haslanger, Ron Mallon, and Naomi Zack's critical commentaries on Joshua Glasgow's book, A Theory of Race.
Keywords Hardimon  Haslanger  Mallon  Zack  Race
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Against Arguments From Reference.Ron Mallon, Edouard Machery, Shaun Nichols & Stephen Stich - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):332 - 356.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-20

Total views
84 ( #105,485 of 2,291,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #581,637 of 2,291,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature